Sunday 15 November 2020

“Who is Man ?” AJ Heschel (1907-1972)

 


“We know what he makes, but we do not know what he is or what to expect of him. “ Heschel  awakened man’s spiritual dimension and it’s underlying anxiety that he calls “the need to be needed” and that something is asked of man and that he is not a mere bystander in the cosmos.


Heschel ultimately submitted to God and God needs man for the attainment of his ends in the world.


Abraham Joshua Heschel (1907-1972) was a Polish-born American rabbi and one of the leading theologians and philosophers of the 20th century; he also participated in the civil rights movement with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. (such as the march on Selma), and against the Vietnam War


Heschel persuaded the Catholic Church to eliminate or modify passages in its liturgy that demeaned the Jews, or referred to an expected conversion to Christianity. His theological works argued that religious experience is a fundamentally human impulse, not just a Jewish one. He believed that no religious community could claim a monopoly on religious truth. For these and other reasons, Martin Luther King Jr. called Heschel "a truly great prophet."  Heschel actively participated in the Civil Rights movement, and was a participant in the third Selma, Alabama to Montgomery march, accompanying Dr. King and John Lewis on 25 March 1965. 



“Who is Man? (1965)

In these three lectures, originally delivered in somewhat different form as The Raymond Fred West Memorial Lectures at Stanford University in May 1963, Dr. Heschel inquired into the logic of being human: What is meant by being human? What are the grounds on which to justify a human being’s claim to being human? 


In the author’s words, “We have never been as openmouthed and inquisitive, never as astonished and embarrassed at our ignorance about man. We know what he makes, but we do not know what he is or what to expect of him.  Is it not conceivable that our entire civilization is built upon a misinterpretation of man? Or that the tragedy of man is due to the fact that he is a being who has forgotten the question: Who is Man? 


The failure to identify himself, to know what is authentic human existence, leads him to assume a false identity, to pretend to be what he is unable to be or to not accepting what is at the very root of his being. Ignorance about man is not lack of knowledge, but false knowledge.”


One of the world’s most illustrious and influential theologians here confronts one of the crucial philosophical and religious questions of our time: the nature and role of man.


Abraham Joshua Heschel - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Joshua_Heschel


"Animals are content when their needs are satisfied; man insists not only on being satisfied but also on being able to satisfy, on being a need not simply on having needs. Personal needs come and go, but one anxiety remains: Am I needed? There is no human being who has not been moved by that anxiety."(p.57)


This is a book on philosophical ideas which attempts to answer the age old question of Who Man Is?


Some of the topics that are dealt within the book : To think of man in human terms; Do we live what we are? ; Self-knowledge as part of our being human; The self as a problem; The logic of being human; The dimension of meaning; The essence of being human.


From the  book there are quite a few things to learn and apply in real life :;


"It is a fatal illusion to assume that to be human is a fact given with human being rather than a goal and an achievement. To animals the world is what it is; to man this is a world in the making, and being human means being on the way, striving, waiting, hoping." (P. 41)


Knowledge and reciprocity

"Knowledge is a debt, not a private property. To be a person is to reciprocate, to offer in return what one receives." (P. 46)


Man’s Unique Need to be Needed

"Animals are content when their needs are satisfied; man insists not only on being satisfied but also on being able to satisfy, on being a need not simply on having needs. Personal needs come and go, but one anxiety remains: Am I needed? There is no human being who has not been moved by that anxiety." (P. 57)


Man's complexity

"There are alleys in the soul where man walks alone, ways that do not lead to society, a world of privacy that shrinks from the public eye. Life comprises not only arable, productive land, but also mountains of dreams, an underground of sorrow, towers of yearning ... " (P. 59)


The Task of Mankind

"It is only despair that claims: the task of man is to let the world be. It is self-deception to assume that man can ever be an innocent spectator. To be human is to be involved, nolens volens, to act and to react, to wonder and to respond. For man, to be is to play a part in a cosmic drama, knowingly or unknowingly." (P. 68)


Two Ways

"There are two primary ways in which man relates himself to the world that surrounds him: manipulation and appreciation. In the first way he sees in what surrounds him things to be handled, forces to be managed, objects to be put to use. In the second way he sees in what surrounds him things to be acknowledged, understood, valued or admired. It is the hand that creates the tools for the purpose of manipulation, and it is the ear and the eye by which we attain appreciation. (p. 82)


Fellowship depends upon appreciation, while manipulation is the cause of alienation: objects and I apart, things stand dead, and I am alone. What is more decisive: a life of manipulation distorts the image of the world. Reality is equated with availability: what I can manipulate is, what I cannot manipulate is not. A life of manipulation is the death of transcendence. (p. 82)


Two Versions of Man

To the Greek mind, man is above all a rational being; rationality makes him compatible with the cosmos. To the biblical mind, man is above all a commanded being, a being of whom demands may be made. The central problem is not: What is being? but rather: What is required of me? 


Greek philosophy began in a world without a supreme, living, one God. It could not accept the gods or the example of their conduct. Plato had to break with the gods and to ask: What is the good? And the problem of values was born. And it was the idea of values that took the place of God. Plato lets Socrates ask: What is good? Yet Moses' question was: What does God require of thee? (p. 107)


Failure to understand what is demanded of us is the source of anxiety. The acceptance of our existential debt is the prerequisite for sanity. The world was not made by man. The earth is the Lord's not a derelict. What we own, we owe. "How shall I ever repay to the Lord all his bounties to me!" (Psalm 116:12) (p. 112)


https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/403110.Who_Is_Man_


Quotes

“We are closer to God when we are asking questions than when we think we have the answers.


“Man cannot see God, but man can be seen by God. He is not the object of a discovery but the subject of revelation.”


“Never once in my life did I ask God for success or wisdom or power or fame. I asked for wonder, and he gave it to me.”

—Abraham Joshua Heschel


Racism as the root of poverty


“Racism is Satanism.” It was this conviction that launched Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, a religious Jew from a Hasidic family in Poland, into the American civil rights movement.

He appears beside Martin Luther King Jr. in several of the most iconic photographs of that time: crossing Edmund Pettus Bridge arm in arm in March 1965; and standing together outside Arlington Cemetery in silent protest of the Vietnam War in 1968.


The two came from very different backgrounds – King had grown up in Atlanta, Georgia, while Heschel arrived in the United States as a refugee from Hitler’s Europe in March of 1940 – “a brand plucked from the fire,” as he wrote. Yet the two found an intimacy that transcended the growing public rift between their two communities. Heschel brought King and his message to a wide Jewish audience, and King made Heschel a central figure in the struggle for civil rights. Often lecturing together, they both spoke about racism as the root of poverty and its role in the war in Vietnam; both also spoke about Zionism and about the struggles of Jews in the Soviet Union. The concern that they shared was “saving the soul of America.”


By the time Heschel and King met, the nation was tense: the Birmingham campaign was underway in the first months of 1963, and on June 11, 1963, George Wallace, governor of Alabama, attempted to block the enrollment of Vivian Malone and James Hood at the University of Alabama; federal troops forced him to step aside. That night, President Kennedy delivered a major televised speech, promising legislation and calling civil rights a “moral issue.” The next day, Medgar Evers, field secretary of the NAACP in Mississippi, was murdered.


The March on Washington took place in August 1963, with more than two hundred thousand people participating.

Friday 13 November 2020

人是誰? (A J Herschel 赫舍尔

 Who is Man ? 人是誰? 

A J   Herschel 赫舍尔 1907-1972


本书深刻地探讨人存在的意义,作者最后还是没有结論,用神学的观点,希望人类是上帝的合作者,配合上帝的夢想和計劃。


人是谁〔美〕赫舍尔在线阅读

http://www.saohua.com/shuku/zhexue/mydoc086.htm


美籍犹太教哲学家和神学家.《人是谁》这本小册子是他对人的生存及地位的问题的回答.


没有人类的帮助,地球照样会转动大自然拥有满足我们一切需要的机会 誰需要人呢?


有一个需要不能满足,那就是要求被需要。一切需要都是单方面的, 大部分生存正是被限制在这种单面性(onesidednes)中只有一个自由的人才懂得,实存的真正意义只有在奉献,在给予! 事实是,我们的实存也是一种需要。


我们的需要是暂时的,而我们被需要则是长久的。 (p 86 )

作者指出:” 奥斯威辛事件和广岛事件之后,哲学再不能依然故我某些关于人性的断言被证明是虚有其表,被打得粉碎. ...我们提供生存的智慧——不仅在我们孤寂的书房里切合时宜,而且在我们面临令人发指的酷行和大灾难的威胁时也切合时宜而且应该在看到死亡集中营的囚徒时,在看到原子弹爆炸的蘑菇云时,考虑到人的问题

  人是谁有什么意义(P96) .

人需要意义,但是,如果终极的意义不需要人,并且人不能把自己同它联系起来,那么,终极的意义对人也就毫无意义如果是单向的联系,如探求和索取,人与意义的相遇便依然是人所不可企及的目标.



人对自身行为的感受能力,对自身行为表示疑问的能力,把自身行为看作是一个难题而不是單纯由最小而不变的事实组的结构和能力,這是做人的根本性質。

人的主要問题不是他的本性,而是如何对待他的本性。

现代人的悲剧在于人是这样一个存在:他竟忘记了人是谁这个问题.


根据《圣经》的思想,核心问题不是什么是存在?而是如何存在和如何不存在? p.71 )




  当我們不能确定自身的身分,不了解人的真正存在是什么,这使人采取了错误的身分,假装出一副他不可能是的样子,不承认他的存在的基础中的东西对人的无知不是缺乏知识,而是由于错误的知识.


人的存在的含义,不仅仅包括存在 ( being ;在人的存在中,至关重要的是某些隐蔽的、被压抑的、被忽视或者被歪曲的东西怎样才能透过人的调节装置的外壳,并探究这种调节装置是不是他的最高使命(vocation)呢?


人是不仅行动,而且还思考他是如何行动的一种存在人对自身行为的感受能力,对自身行为表示疑问的能力,把自身行为看作是一个难题而不是单纯由最小的、不变的和最终的事实组成的结构的能力,这是做人(being human )的根本性质


人在何处?我们在生命的什么阶段上,在他的实存的什么境况中看到人的真实面目?他不断变化,反复无常,以不同的角色出现他作为售货员或士兵,同他作为父母是一样的吗?他从摇篮到坟墓,从洞穴时代到火箭时代,是一成不变的吗?


人处在实验性的、未决的、不确定的和终极的、固定的、确定的两极之间.任何事物都是可能的人的特征具有模糊性,人的行为具有两可性,因而人的恒定性中包含着内在矛盾人有许多张面孔,哪张面孔是真实的 ?


自我认识完全不能严格限制在对事实进行描述的范围内,因为自我本身是事实和规范组成的复合体,是由现状(what is)和意识到应当怎样” ( what ought to be )组成的复合体做人的实质在于价值,价值包含在人的存在中.如上所说,人的难题是由于我们碰到存在与期望之间的冲突或矛盾才产生的因而,自我认识的根源就在于意识到自我是一个难题;它作为一种批判的反思而起作用消除骄傲自负,对自我及其行为和特点提出怀疑,是自我认识的主要动因.自我认识完全依赖于自我判断,它不应等同于观察和自我观察单纯的描述,简单地教条式地承认自我,等于取消人的难题,这实际上是放弃自我认识简言之,如果做人依旧是一个难题,我们就必须认识到,把描述方法当作唯一的方法加以运用,它最多只能使我们达到自我观察,却不能解决难题.


正是苏格拉底把人的本性当作一个难题分离了出来,而不考虑人同神的关系他在自我审视的意义上使用了认识你自己这一格言(柏拉图:《斐德罗篇》,230)

人必须探询他自己的本性;通过自我认识,人享受到无穷福祉,人如果对自己不了解,则会沾染罪恶(色诺芬:

  《苏格拉底言行回忆录》)


当动物的需要得到满足时,它们就知足了;人则不仅要求被满足,还要求能够满足别人,不仅要求拥有所需要的东西,而且要求自己成为一种需要个人的需要得而复失,但焦虑仍一如既往:别人需要我吗?没有哪一个人不被这种焦虑所触动.


这是一件最重要的事实:对自己来说,人是不充分的,如果生命不为自我以外的目的服务,如果生命对别人没有价值,那么生命对人就没有意义.人对自己而言,不是包罗一切的目的康德的第二句名言:永远不要把人类仅仅当作工具,而要把他们当作目的.这句话只是表明,一个人应该如何被别人看待,而不是指他应该如何看待自己因为如果一个人认为他是他自己的目的,那么他就会把其他人当作工具而且如果把人就是目的这一观念看作对自身价值的真实评定的话,那么,就不能指望他为了他人的或群体的利益牺牲自己的生命或利益他希望别人怎样对待自己,他也就必然怎样对待自己p.81) 


Herschel認为 人的实存不一定能从社会得到其终极意义,因为社会本身也需要意义

在人们的灵魂中,有一条不与社会相通的小道,人们在这条小路上踽踽独行,这是一个避开众目睽睽的私人世界. ”


如果社会将拒绝我的服务,甚至将我置于孤独的隔离中以便我死后绝不会为我所热爱的世界留下任何财富,那么我是不是会被迫结束我的生命呢?


做人的本质

人不仅要求被满足,还要求能够满足别人,不仅要求拥有所需要的东西,而且要求自己成为一种需要.没有哪一个人不被这种焦虑所触动.这是一件最重要的事实:如果生命不为自我以外的目的服务,如果生命对别人没有价值,那么生命对人就没有意义.


为什么为了一个群体或整个民族,便可以牺牲个人的生命呢?对于一个把自己看作是绝对目的人来说,一千个人的生命也不比自己的生命更有价值


避免绝望的唯一方法是使自己成为一个被需要者,而不是成为目的事实上,幸福可以被定义为确信被别人所需要但是谁需要人呢?


首先想到的答案就是社会的需要 - 人的目的就是为社会或人类服务因此,一个人的最高价值就取决于他对别人有用,取决于他的社会工作效果.   然而,他还是希望别人不要根据他对别人有什么意义来衡量他,而要把他看作自身是有价值的存在


而被人爱,而不是因为他们有成就或财产而被人爱那些老弱病残者也不是因为他们可能回报我们而希望得到帮助谁需要老人和患不治之症的人呢?


在人们的灵魂中,有一条不与社会相通的小道,人们在这条小路上踽踽独行,这是一个避开众目睽睽的私人世界生活不仅包括可耕种的肥田沃土,也包括梦的山峦、悲哀的地窖和渴望的塔楼.


除非人变成一台机器,其中每颗螺丝钉都必须发挥作用,否则将被取掉只有那企图剥夺私人利益的牟利的国家,才要求所有的人为其服务如果体现为国家的社会最终是腐朽的,而且我医治其罪恶的努力是徒劳的话,那么,我的个体的生命是不是就完全失去意义了呢?如果社会将拒绝我的服务,甚至将我置于孤独的隔离中以便我死后绝不会为我所热爱的世界留下任何财富,那么我是不是会被迫结束我的生命呢?


存在与意义(p91 ) 


探讨存在的意义就是探讨超越于存在之上的东西,就是揭示纯粹存在的不足(insuficiency)。

人的使命(vocation)不是接受存在,而是把它与意义联系起来;而且,他的独特难题不是如何进入存在,而是如何进入意义.


人的实存不可能从社会得到其终极意义,因为社会本身也需要意义 宇宙 是不是需要人类?”  谁需要人呢?大自然?难道群山需要我们的诗篇吗?难道没有天文学家,繁星就会陨落吗?


灵魂中所发生的一切现象,最容易衰亡的是欲望它们像水生植物一样,在遗忘的水中成长,急于神秘地消失消亡的意图是欲望所固有的;它维护自己的目的在于被熄灭.在得到满足后,它自己唱着挽歌,走向灭亡.并不是全部人类行为都具有这种自杀性意图思想、概念、法律、理论,自产生起就有延续的意图 (P86) 


我们之所以充分认识到实存的暂时性,并不在于对观念进行推敲,而在于对一个人的内心生活进行考察,在于发现一度热烈珍爱的需要和欲望的终点.然而,人的这种认识却是十分模糊的因为,尽管除了实存的暂时性以外人对什么都不能确定,他也不会甘心仅仅是欲望的载体.


承认存在的终极性,是一个预期的理由(petitio principii) ,它错把问题当作答案最高的、最终极的问题不是存在而是存在的奥秘


宇宙,即存在本身,不能回答关于宇宙的意义或存在的意义问题,因为这个问题要求从与存在不同的角度来考察存在,从高于宇宙的角度来考察存在这个问题指的是对存在的超越;它肯定那超过、高于、凌驾于存在之上的事物在提出这个问题时,我们离开了逻辑的、可以严格证实的思考这个层面,而进入奥秘的局面从逻辑上讲,我们不应该迈出这一步,它超过了正统逻辑的界限然而,尽管各种劝告都坚持和证明这个问题是无意义的,但是人类永远不会停止提出这个问题这个问题自身就能确定其有效性科学不能使它沉默,逻辑的力量也不能长期压制它的确,人如果放弃对意义的焦虑,他就不再成其为人;逻辑实证主义的胜利将是人类的失败.可以举出许多理由来反对寻求意义,但是,正像任何关于呼吸有害的理论不会使人停止呼吸一样,任何认为意义问题是与我们无关的看法,都不能消除人对它的关注


什么是人的存在的意义

(P 96) 

终极意义如果是一种理念,那它就不能回答我们的焦虑.人性不只是一个理智结构;它是涉及个人的特定的现实对意义的迫切要求是迫切要求终极的联系,要求终极归属在这种要求中,任何虚荣自负都被抛弃难道我们在时间的荒野上是孤独的吗?


难道我们在奇妙无穷的宇宙中是孤独的吗?


如上所述,宇宙并不向我们泄露其秘密,而且,它所揭示的也不能用人的语言来表达人的终极意义不是由终极的存在产生的终极的存在与具体的存在没有任何联系.

除非意义与我有联系,否则我不会与意义发生联系.人需要意义,但是,如果终极的意义不需要人,并且人不能把自己同它联系起来,那么,终极的意义对人也就毫无意义

如果是单向的联系,如探求和索取,人与意义的相遇便依然是人所不可企及的目标.